Today, we want to introduce you to the
2015 recipient of the UNA-NCA Louis B. Sohn Human Rights Award, Ambassador Mark Lagon. Ambassador Lagon has a
distinguished career in government, academia, and the non-profit sector. In 2014,
Ambassador Lagon became the president of Freedom House, an independent watchdog
organization that conducts research and advocacy on democracy, political
freedom, and human rights since 1941. In this role he leads a team of 150
people around the world to promote democracy and freedom for all. UNA-NCA asked
Ambassador Lagon about his background and to share his views on important human
rights issues.
UNA-NCA:
Can you tell us a little about yourself and what led you to get
involved in human rights work?
M.L.:
I am the son of World War II Polish refugees, informing my passion to call
aggressive autocracies to account. Working as teaching assistant and research
associate for Ronald Reagan's controversial Ambassador to the UN, Jeane
Kirkpatrick, imprinted an interest in promoting human rights in the UN. I took
on her political scientist's observation that the UN was like a legislature,
requiring playing the game of caucuses of nations—well. My work in think tanks,
the House, Senate, and State Department, and now at Freedom House have been
shaped by those touchstones.
UNA-NCA:
As president of Freedom House, you are exposed to a breadth
of critical human rights issues. In your view, what
is the most pressing issue, and what is Freedom House doing
to address this problem?
M.L.:
Putin's Russia threatens the human rights of its own citizens and neighboring nations.
Brittle and brutal autocrats on the one hand and the violent extremists they
breed on the other roil the Middle East and North Africa—and beyond. But the
single biggest governance problem in the world is the current Chinese regime,
both to the political and religious voice of its own people, and as a
pernicious model suggesting prosperity can come at the cost of a muzzled civil
society. The biggest role Freedom House can play is shedding light on that
repression and that often misunderstood model.
UNA-NCA:
You have held several positions in the Department of State: a member of
the Secretary Colin Powell's Policy Planning Staff, where you focused
on the UN, democracy and human rights; Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Bureau of International Organization Affairs, where you worked
closely with the United Nations; and Ambassador-at-Large, where
you directed the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in
Persons. How did your experience as a diplomat shape your
understanding of human rights?
M.L.:
Yes. I draw three lessons. Diplomacy depends on understanding about the form of
government of your interlocutor –because convergence of interests does not
occur the same way with all other nations. Second, diplomacy depends on
leverage and credibility as much as building understanding. A diplomat would be
better trained a large labor negotiator than a student of conflict resolution. Third,
diplomacy must engage and prioritize civil societies as much as states, and
more.
UNA-NCA:
One of the Department of State’s priorities is protecting human rights;
however, while you served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau
of International Organization Affairs, the United States refused to join
the newly-reformed UN Human Rights Council. How did that policy affect your
ability to do your job?
M.L.:
There was a vigorous debate in the Bush era if the Human Rights Council, the
creation of which I played a small part in negotiating, was better than the
Human Rights Commission, and whether to run for it. Secretary Rice decided not
to run. The US is about to spend a required 1 year off the Council and like
when I was "DAS," will assert some influence as a nonmember. The
Obama Administration has shown being a member of the Council can improve its
work—as a resolution and rapporteur on Iran and a Commission of Inquiry on
North Korean atrocities attest.
UNA-NCA:
Is there an issue area that you are particularly passionate about?
M.L.:
Above all, women's political and economic empowerment matters most to me. The
interest grew in seeing how sex and labor trafficking are often gendered forms
of exploitation. But above all, I believe it important not just because of
equal access to justice but because women are change-makers. They leaven
governance and prosperity.
UNA-NCA: Do you have any human rights heroes or
role models you would like to share with us?
M.L.: I admire a mentor, Paula Dobriansky, who championed as Undersecretary
of State continuing US backing the Community of Democracies initiative of the
previous administration of another party. I am privileged to head an
organization similarly committed to bipartisanship and solidarity of
democracies—including in the UN. Fittingly, Paula is an Officer on Freedom
House's Board.
UNA-NCA:
What are some ways you can suggest in which people who are interested
in human rights can make an impact?
M.L.:
Remember that neither domestic nor international politics is about states. It
is about people. It is about their dignity. It is about their agency to choose
their futures and about them all being recognized as having inherent value. Observers
should watch for when a government or the UN falls short, or even undercuts,
the agency and recognition of all people. That can come in the form of dramatic violence
and atrocities, or corrosive corruption, or persistent prejudice against some
groups--as if they were somehow less human.
UNA-NCA:
Thank you so much for sharing these illuminating points. We look forward to
hearing more of your insights at the UNA-NCA Human rights Awards Reception.
***

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.